• Video
  • 21-Mar-2012 09:57 EDT

Estimating Return on Investment for SAVI (a Model-Based Virtual Integration Process)


Purchase Required to View Video

Short Preview Below

The System Architecture Virtual Integration (SAVI) program is a collaboration of industry, government, and academic organizations within the Aerospace Vehicle System Institute (AVSI) with the goal of structuring a new integration process that relies on a single-truth architectural framework. The SAVI approach of Integrate, then Build provides a modern distributed development environment which arrests the propagation of requirements errors through the development life cycle. It does so by capturing design assumptions and shared properties of the system design in an authoritative, annotated architectural model. This reference model provides a common, analyzable framework for confirming that system requirements remain complete, consistent, and correct at all levels of system decomposition. Core concepts of SAVI include extensive use of model-based system engineering tools and use of a single-truth reference architectural model. From the outset SAVI developers anticipated that a quantified prediction of the productivity of the SAVI Virtual Integration Process (VIP) would be necessary to close the business case for using it. Therefore, the SAVI statement of work at each stage of its feasibility demonstration carried a task to estimate the Return on Investment (RoI). AVSI participants needed a prediction of what the resources poured into SAVI development and deployment would produce. This paper lays out the work done so far to produce these RoI estimates and the assumptions that have gone into them. The paper goes on to illustrate example results for two of the major types of participants in SAVI, and details the current state of the evolving estimation capability. The most important result of this RoI work is a substantial positive RoI predicted for using SAVI's VIP. Initial estimates of RoI for a first application to a commercial aircraft development indicated an expected value of annual RoI for an OEM on the order of 40%. Later estimates gave similar, but more positive, results with modified assumptions. But the range of variation of the estimates has been reduced to less than 1/3 of the original prototype estimator's variation. Savings for suppliers heavily engaged and at risk in the development are also predicted to have double digit annual RoIs, with the exact value of annual RoI rate dependent on the level of involvement of the supplier. The minimum value of annual RoI for the same commercial airliner development was calculated to be 2%, using the initial prototype estimator, but that minimum value of annual arithmetic RoI grew to over 70% per year in the refined estimator.

Steven Helton

Purchase to View
Learn More
Estimating Return on Investment for SAVI (a Model-Based Virtual Integration Process)
HTML for Linking to Page
Page URL
Rate It
No ratings yet

View More Video

Impact of driving patterns on fuel economy is significant in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Driving patterns affect propulsion and braking power requirement of vehicles, and they play an essential role in HEV design and control optimization. Driving pattern conscious adaptive strategy can lead to further fuel economy improvement under real-world driving. This paper proposes a real-time driving pattern recognition algorithm for supervisory control under real-world conditions. The proposed algorithm uses reference real-world driving patterns parameterized from a set of representative driving cycles. The reference cycle set consists of five synthetic representative cycles following the real-world driving distance distribution in the US Midwestern region. Then, statistical approaches are used to develop pattern recognition algorithm. Driving patterns are characterized with four parameters evaluated from the driving cycle velocity profiles.
Many manufacturing companies want to apply AFP technology to complex high-curvature part shapes. As new AFP machine technologies are developed to specifically apply material over complex shapes, new and innovative NC programming approaches are needed to successfully, reliably, and accurately apply material with good consolidation, while meeting the fiber direction and coverage requirements. A big issue with AFP is the production rate vs. part complexity. Most complex shapes can be created with a single .125? wide strip (tow) of material. But the production time would be impractically long. So machine builders create 6, 8, 16, even 32 tow AFP heads, and use the widest tow possible for the highest laydown rates. But then wide compaction rollers on these systems have difficulty consolidating material over curved surfaces, and the minimum steering radius of wider tows challenge the software?s ability to meet the layup requirements.
In recent years, all major microprocessor manufacturers are transitioning towards the deploymenet of multiple processing cores on every chip. These multi-core architectures represent the industry consensus regarding the most effective utilization of available silicon resources to satisfy growing demands for processing and memory capacities. Porting off-the-shelf software capabilities to multi-core architectures often requires significant changes to data structures and algorithms. When developing new software capabilities specifically for deployment on SMP architectures, software engineers are required to address specific multi-core programming issues, and in the ideal, must do so in ways that are generic to many different multi-core target platforms. This talk provides an overview of the special considerations that must be addressed by software engineers targeting multi-core platforms and describes how the Java language facilitates solutions to these special challenges.
Zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, and quasi-dimensional models for simulation of SI and CI engines with respect to: engine breathing and boosting; SI combustion and emissions; CI combustion and emissions; fundamentals of engine thermodynamics; thermal management; mechanical and lubrication systems; system level models for controls; system level models for vehicle fuel economy and emissions predictions. Presenter Fabio Bozza, Universita di Napoli

Related Items

Training / Education
Training / Education
Technical Paper / Journal Article